TradeCopia · A Fork in the Road

The Copy-Trading Plan

The manual method — a MacBook, iPhone, and iMac running at once, alternating live between accounts by hand — got the job done through two evals, but it was never going to scale, and it introduced real human error under pressure. This page is the full, current record of what replaced it: TradeCopia, the account structure behind it, the compliance research that reshaped that structure twice, and the risk-limit decisions that came out of it.

The Structure — Two Groups, Two Flips

Grouped by leader, matched on account size and firm-policy compatibility first — not by drawdown mechanic. Both groups have been restructured at least once since the original plan, each time for a real reason, documented here rather than smoothed over.

GroupLeaderFollowersWhy this shape
A — Strict News Discipline LucidFlex25 (25K) TPT (50K, 2x multiplier), LegendsTrading (50K, 2x multiplier) Flipped from TPT-led to Lucid-led once a micro-contract sizing habit stopped scaling cleanly under TPT. LegendsTrading joined as a second follower Sep 25, 2026.
B — TopOne Derived TOF197288 (TopOne Elite ACCESS, 50K) TOF197292, Apex-11, Apex-12, TOF218430, TOF218431 (all 50K, 1x) Rebuilt from a mismatched-size TopOne→Lucid pairing (a policy violation) into same-size-only TOF-to-TOF/TOF-to-Apex copying. Now 5 followers.

Named "TopOne Derived" specifically to honor TOF's own policy language — "trade decisions must originate from activity on our platform." Full account-by-account rationale: Scaling SOP doc ↗

What the Compliance Research Actually Found

Every firm's copy-trading stance is different, and none of it was assumed — each was fetched or asked directly before the structure above was finalized

"Cannot copy between different programs or different sizes, even with software." — TopOneFutures' copy-trading policy, confirmed by TOF's own AI assistant to rule out the original TopOne→25K-Lucid pairing.
"You do not need to send a request to use Tradecopia as your trade copier; you may simply use this going forward." — Apex support, resolving `apex-rules_legacy.md`'s "submit for approval" requirement without an actual pre-clearance step.
TradeCopia is on TakeProfitTrader's own explicit approved-copier list, alongside Tradesyncer and platform-native tools — confirmed directly from TPT's official Trade Copier Policy article, not assumed from the general rules doc.
Risk Settings — $555, Everywhere, On Purpose

The six settings originally asked for, mapped to what TradeCopia actually exposes — five per-group toggles, plus a personal daily-loss ceiling applied to all six accounts

Full worked examples for every toggle, including a plain-language breakdown of what "disable replication on breach" actually costs vs. protects: tradecopia-risk-toggle-deep-dive.md ↗

Lessons From the First Live Week

Everything above was reasoned through before going live. This is what actually happened once real trading started — corrections, not theory.

Full write-up of all five, plus the exact screenshots behind the $999 daily-loss edge case: tradecopia-risk-toggle-deep-dive.md ↗

Contract Scaling — Why the Leader/Follower Shape Actually Works

Same-size compliance isn't the only constraint behind Group A/B's shape — a follower with a lower max-contract ceiling than what's being mirrored to it simply fails to execute. The leader in each group needs headroom at or above its followers'.

AccountEval scalingFunded ceiling
TopOneFutures 50K (Group B leader)Same tiers apply in eval$0–$1,499: 1 mini/10 micros · $1,500–$1,999: 2 minis/20 micros · $2,000+: 3 minis/30 micros (full)
Apex 50K (Group B followers)No scaling plan3 minis/30 micros max, capped at half until EOD balance clears initial + trailing DD + $100
TakeProfitTrader 50K (Group A follower)No scaling, everFlat 6 contracts/60 micros, always
LucidFlex 25K (Group A leader)No scaling plan$0–$999: 1 mini/10 micros · $1,000–$1,999: 2 minis/20 micros (25K tier tops out here)

Top1 (leader) always has contract headroom at or above Apex (follower); LucidFlex25 (leader, 1-2 minis at 25K) leading into TPT (follower, flat 6 always) means the follower's ceiling is never the constraint either — confirming both groups' leader-from-the-smaller-or-matched account shape holds up on scaling, not just the size-compliance and whole-number-multiplier reasoning above. Full LucidFlex table by account size: LucidFlex Scaling Plan ↗

Why This Matters Beyond the Settings

The account ledger on the gallery page carries its own subtitle: "what once looked like a graveyard is a resurrection project." That's not a figure of speech — the recovery arc starts Feb 13, 2026, with a blowup and no rule held. Everything since has been rebuilding discipline one rule at a time.

TradeCopia's Daily Loss enforcement is the first automated backstop for a failure mode personal discipline alone has never fully covered: being physically unable to close a trade in time, whether from a mental-stop habit or a power/internet failure removing the ability to execute manually. Not a replacement for discipline — the next layer on top of it.

Full Documentation
Full Scaling SOP

Sep 3, 2026 — The Day This Was Built

The full daily review — both leader flips, the compliance research, and the $555 decision, written the same day it happened.

A screen recording of a session just like this one: Fortuna working live in Claude-in-Chrome, side by side, real-time — including an actual mid-flow interruption to make a change on the fly. Not a scripted demo, just what a normal working session looks like

Live Results & Case Studies

Real screenshots from the actual TradeCopia dashboard, as they happen — success, edge cases, or anything worth showing. This grows over time rather than staying a one-time proof.

Back to the origin story: PropFirmMatchTV ↗

Group A — Strict News Discipline: Full History

Originally TPT-led, since TPT's own PRO Account Rules #6 news-blackout obligation gated every trade before it reached either account. Flipped once a 1-micro-contract sizing habit (WASL logic on MNQ/MGC) was found to scale down to 0.5 of a contract at 0.5x — not a valid position. Leading from the smaller account and scaling up guarantees a whole number every time. The tradeoff: TPT's automatic gate is gone; that gap is covered by trading both leaders manually and independently. LegendsTrading (won via a KnightTrader giveaway) joined as a second follower Sep 25, 2026 — rules ingestion in progress, see the placeholder in Full Documentation below. As of Sep 23, 2026 this group's literal in-app name reads "NoNews:TPT&LGNDMaxFund | LFlex=NewsAllowed; Lucid/LGND=NoMBT" — a personal fail-safe reminder, not just a label: TPT and Legends (once max-funded) must not trade through news, LucidFlex itself is allowed to, and Lucid-style accounts including Legends cannot trade MBT (Micro Bitcoin) contracts. See the Copy-Trading section of the Pre-Flight Checklist ↗ for the full detail this shorthand doesn't have room to spell out.

Group B — TopOne Derived: Full History

The original plan paired a 50K TopOne leader with a 25K Lucid follower — TopOneFutures' own copy-trading policy prohibits mismatched-size cross-firm copying, and TOF's own AI assistant confirmed that exact pairing is a violation. Rebuilt around matching sizes instead: same-size TOF-to-TOF (TOF's own explicitly-allowed case) and same-size TOF-to-Apex. TOF218430/TOF218431 (a second BOGO+20%-off Elite ACCESS pair) joined as followers Sep 15, 2026, growing the group from 3 followers to 5. This group's literal in-app name reads "TopOneAccessElite*MustLead & ONLYsameTypeTop1Acct can follow" — same-size still the operative word even though the shorthand says "type."